Thread Tools  
Dolly_Wen
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Dolly_Wen is on a distinguished road Posts: 14
about the timing issue, Posted November 22nd, 2013 #1
Hi, our lab uses psychopy (based on python) to present stimuli for ERP experiments. But we find delays between the trigger sent by psychopy and the actual stimulus event recorded by stimtracker. Does anybody have some idea on what is wrong and possible solution?
The delay is as large as 30ms to 40ms...
Reply With Quote
MonikaT
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
MonikaT is on a distinguished road Posts: 1,279
Posted November 27th, 2013 #2
When sending event codes from the computer it will suffer delays from the USB drivers and should only be used to send event codes. i.e only to describe the trial, but not to mark its precise onset. To get the precise onset I suggest taking advantage of the lightsensor and built in audio stamping.
Reply With Quote
Dolly_Wen
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Dolly_Wen is on a distinguished road Posts: 14
Posted January 6th, 2014 #3
Hi, what we found is that sending event codes from the computer is faster than the onset marked by lightsensor.
Reply With Quote
Hisham
Founder
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: San Pedro, CA
Hisham is on a distinguished road Posts: 1,201
Posted January 6th, 2014 #4
The light sensors are really fast at detecting light (50 microseconds), though their release time is much slower (4 milliseconds). See the Specifications page. You will experience the longer 4 millisecond delay if you are switching from white to black.

Sending event codes from the computer using USB will introduce variability.
Reply With Quote
Tags
biosemi, psychopy, python, stimtracker, timing delay
Thread Tools
Posting Rules
Forum Jump:
Copyright Cedrus Corporation, 1991-2014.
All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:30 PM.